In his post; Doing what needs to be done, saying what needs to be said Charles raises the point that the recently bereaved aren’t given the opportunity to grieve practically and effectively through active funeral ritual and rite during liminal mourning, and celebrants need to encourage them into more hands-on involvement. Of course this means, among other things, gently opening up the idea of a useful, rather than a merely dutiful, funeral, which may be a foreign concept to many. It all takes time. And, as X-Piry rightly points out in her comment, time is the one thing we’re mostly short of. But why?
Let’s not demonize the poor funeral director. He’s only doing his job (with a handful of notable exceptions, they know who they are). But that’s just the trouble, isn’t it? What, or rather who, is the common denominator in all such unnecessarily hurried funerals?
Remember my post about my son’s girlfriend’s sister who was killed by a bus? We had her funeral on Tuesday, over three weeks after she died. To cut a long story short it worked perfectly, for all the literally hundreds of people there, including me, and total strangers hugged me afterwards in floods of tears to tell me so. One comment summed up them all: “It hurt like hell, but it did my heart good.”
All I did was arrange as well as conduct it – I acted as funeral director as well as celebrant – according to the family’s evolving needs over the weeks. It was a long, painful journey for us all but every step, every twist and turn, was essential. It was as if the funeral went on for the whole three weeks, communicated partly through Facebook between her hundreds of young friends, with everyone actively involved and connected from the start right through to the end of the ceremony and beyond. It has changed my own concept of the funeral out of all recognition, and mostly thanks to the young ones because they were so open.
What I did was something any celebrant could do. The only thing you need a funeral director for is a fridge big enough for a body (and even then, only when you can’t keep it in a hospital mortuary), and probably to sell you a coffin. It’s possible to find an obliging one if you explain yourself nicely – you don’t even have to be one of the family.
Just maybe, then, the answer is that the celebrants’ movement has to promote itself not to funeral directors but to the public, and to provide the full service ourselves? I trained in funeral advice and arranging with Green Fuse (one of the bracketed F.Ds above, see their website), and that’s how I managed it – it’s easier than you’d think. So how about it, fellow celebrants?
It may alienate some funeral directors, but they’re not the boss. The purpose of the likes of Charles’s blog, as I see it, is to help us enlighten and empower the grieving public, at or long before the funeral. Celebrants are so much better at ceremony than most funeral directors, and it doesn’t make sense to hand the vital function of making the arrangements to someone who doesn’t truly understand the chaotic evolution of grieving in the early days, and isn’t committed to putting a family’s changing needs before his own. Funeral directors could do it, obviously, but do they? Mostly not. And we can’t wait for them. This is one area where time really is short.
We are in the early days of a funerary revolution, begun perhaps by the Natural Death Centre, the Humanists and others, and now largely in the hands of liberal independents (us). There’s no-one in charge except ourselves and the families we work for. It’s only our own habit that limits us to others’ habits, and we can envisage and accomplish anything we want, however apparently outlandish or arduous, with enough imagination and commitment. There are plenty of us if we want to begin it. This is more than just a job to most of us.
Wouldn’t you throw yourself down in the path of Destiny to pave the way for Death? Of course you would. We can come together and promote the reality of the Celebrant/Funeral Director. I’ve started already, with the help, support and training of Green Fuse, and it’s so, so much more rewarding than the ‘damage limitation’ job I see myself doing over and over again, trying to make the ceremony good enough to compensate for the (poor family’s lack of involvement in the) same old superficial ritual. I’m up for it if you are.
Jonathan Taylor
jmtaylor55@yahoo.co.uk
4 Comments:
Yes - hooray!
The last funeral I conducted was one in which I was Celebrant/FD (and incidentally embalmer too)........
The 'damage limitation' job that seems to be the 'norm' these days really doesn't fulfill the deepest needs of what I truly feel that humanity yearns for in the face of a death.
Such a profound event surely needs to be embraced and not just 'dealt with'.
Oh I could go on and on and on...involvement - imagination and commitment. Yes please - more of them all...
Thanks Jonathan!
And as for your wonderful previous howling honest personal account - yes - even those of us who surround ourselves in the mess and mire of death daily are brought down to earth significantly by the reality of it. The previous comment was about my last remaining relative...I have buried all the others over the past 20 years and each time my own reaction has been a revelation.
Sadly - I have never managed your eloquence...and remain perplexed as to the depth of loss, suffering and need that even an expected death of an 104 year old grandmother can precipitate.
I guess for us who work in it and with it - our own encounter with the reapers scythe should never leave us unscathed....
We owe it to our fellows - that way, surely we can be more effective.
But we need to be able to howl...and hurt too sometimes...
xx
I read your comments with interest being a funeral director who would love to be constantly challenged by my clients. However in reality the comment I hear time after time is "As soon as possible."
The only time a family will wait usually is if it is a sudden death or tragedy of some kind.
Sad as that is, it is not a direct line to celebrants that is needed, it is a greater awareness of what is available for funeral services and that needs to be placed in the public consciousness before they need our services. When a bereaved family is sat in front of me they are not usually ready to take on board new ideas about funeral rites.
I think you would be better served by suggesting that the families pick a funeral director that seems to be open to any ideas that they have and speak to more than one before they choose.
I think you may be surprised at how many funeral directors also want more than the "same old superficial ritual" for the families that they serve.
Kind regards,
David Barrington
Independent Funeral Director
Hurrah well done Jonathan. We came to this conclusion 10 years ago. this is the future. Bringing in a celebrant doesn't work, we work closely with the family from the moment of death to after the funeral, they really don't need another stranger coming in to their home and having to explain it all over again, not everything can be told in 2 or 3 hours. Information is gleaned over time, as you get a sense of the dead person and their family. The humanists are a dull lot in my view, the tree of life? please. They still have all of literature to call on. And I object to their self promotional bit at the beginning of each service. I find the increasingly made up, parasitical new jobs endlessly being created extraordinary, the celebrants the funeral advisors, which basically means yet another bill for a bit of friendly advice, all this should be covered by your undertaker; they're the people who have the dead body, they're the people who are taking you by the hand and helping you to face the truth, they're the people who are in a position to judge when everybody is ready to let go of the body. Oh and by the way this whole movement was very definately started by the Natural Death Centre 19 years ago.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home