Thursday 7 January 2010

Counting the cost

Here in the UK we are all following, intently or wearily, the furore created by the declaration of intent by Anjem Choudary and Islam4UK to hold a procession through the streets of Wootton Basset “not in memory of the occupying and merciless British military, but rather the real war dead who have been shunned by the Western media and general public as they were and continue to be horrifically murdered in the name of Democracy and Freedom - the innocent Muslim men, women and children.”

Silly stunt, you may say. Politicians of all hues have condemned him. Many would ban him. Sir Hugh Orde, president of the Association of Chief Police Officers (Acpo), says he would be "surprised" if senior officers in Wiltshire seek to block the protest because any group has a right to march even if their views are "unpleasant and offensive ... Our view is we will have to deal with it, people have a right to march. People might not like it but that is the law.”

Whichever side you’re on, it’s worth looking at this in the light of the ritual which now attends the repatriation of dead service people. That’s what I want to focus on: this new ritual.

It’s a recent thing, this bringing home our dead, only made possible by skilful morticians, refrigeration and aeroplanes. It’s a novelty. It’s also a curiosity. These processions through Wootton Bassett look like funeral processions, but they’re not. They are journeys to the coroner. When dead civilians go to the coroner they go, not in a hearse, but in a low key van of some sort (call it a private ambulance if you like) in everyday traffic. It’s a non-event and none the poorer for that. The funeral to come is the thing, after all.

It’s as if these dead service people are being given a sort of pre-funeral. Why? Don’t people have the opportunity to honour them (or protest about them) after the coroner has handed them back to their families at their funeral proper? Of course they do. So why?

It’s an invention of the Ministry of Defence. PR? It’s your call. These processions are well regarded. And bringing home the dead in this way certainly gives the country a way of counting the cost of the war in Afghanistan.

But while these processions offer ordinary people the chance to pay their respects to the dead, they have also become expressions of patriotism and militarism. Wootton Bassett is no place for pacifists or dissenters. It’s Daily Mail country. It’s got political. So it’s no surprise to see the political Mr Choudary requiring the right, in his own way, to drive home the cost of the war to Afghan civilians.

If Wootton Bassett has become a political battleground, the invention of this about-to-be-hijacked ritual is something the MoD may now regret.

No death threats, please. Use a comments box to put me right.

Labels:

4 Comments:

Blogger Rupert Callender said...

I thought that Mr Choudrau was doing okay up until his mentioning Bin Laden. Even for a hug a hoodie bleeding heart liberal like myself, that's going a little too far.

10 January 2010 at 17:05  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

A valid subject Charles, and a brave man you are indeed for airing the topic on your blog.

I'm surprised at the lack of merry souls willing to post a comment - but, there again, maybe not. It really is a "thin ice" issue.

"I disagree with what you say, but I'll fight to the death to uphold your freedom to say it.." echoes in my ears.

Where DO we draw the line between allowing equal freedom of expression, and that street corner where enough meets enough?

My wife thinks that the stick-twirling top-hatted gentleman paging the hearses looks quite superb, and very dignified. I, on the other hand, think that just that one item, is "over the top".

It allows a dignified procession to the Coroner to be "hijacked" into a PR "spin".

How much more dignified it might be with just the hearses and police escort front and back.....and maybe without the stopping in the street. All the next of kin have been at a reception already at the airfield.

Whatever our feelings on the matter, Our loyal and ever valuable service personnel deserve the recognition for giving their ultimate gift to this country - Freedom.

10 January 2010 at 17:41  
Blogger Barnacle Bill said...

Interesting posting Charles with some valid points from the opposite side of the road shall we say.
My belief is that the WB "ritual" was not an engineered PR stunt by the MoD but a reaction by the inhabitants of WB to the lack of any formal recognition from the government, especially this administration, to our returning "Fallen Heroes".
One could not realistically expect the PM nor a more lesser minister actually attending the funereal of one of these "Fallen Heroes"; however at least some recognition of the sacrifice made could be acknowledged by attending the returning flights.

13 January 2010 at 09:14  
Anonymous Jonathan said...

I'm surprised, reading the above, that none (except implicitly Rupert's) mentions the validity of commemorating the fallen "enemy" civilian heroes and heroines whose deaths, so the military ideal logically goes, contribute as much to our freedom as do those of our soldiers.

17 January 2010 at 15:51  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home