Tuesday 3 November 2009

Cross

Just once in a while things, if they are little enough and come in a cluster, can subvert the sunny disposition for which I am justly famous.

This morning I was at Sutton Coldfield crematorium, my first time. I had already got the measure of the place. A telephone enquiry yesterday about whether there was a funeral immediately after ‘mine’ yielded the most remorseless lecture I have ever had from a public servant about the vital importance of keeping within my appointed limits: 20 minutes. Twenty minutes! Once there, I went to strike up an acquaintance with the organist-CD chap. The service before ‘mine’ was over and the mourners were departing to the strains of—you guessed it. “Good heavens,” I said to him, “My Way. What a most unusual song to play at a funeral.” He looked at me with weary earnestness and said it was the song he played most. I was in an irony-free zone. I got ‘my’ funeral off at the stroke of twelve noon. It was always going to be a close run thing, cramming a goodbye to a tremendously nice and loved man into twenty minutes. In the event, we had to do without the interlude for silent reflection, hurry the farewell a little, wrap it up just in time. Only when it was over did I discover that the next funeral was a ‘committal only’—the dead chap had already had his funeral in church and had just come to be burnt. His lot were in and out in five minutes. We could have had five/ten mins of their half hour, no problem, they never would have minded. But when the needs of the institution are greater than those of its users, give and take go out of the window. Still, at least the funeral director was nice to me. “Thank you so much for taking this for us,” she said. I didn’t have the energy to point out that the relicts had phoned and booked me direct, that I was working for them, not her. I just left.

And came home to an article in the Guardian of such pusillanimity that it actually got under my skin. It’s by a creep called Phil Hall, who describes himself as a “socialist, a college/university lecturer and teacher trainer based in west London. He's African by birth, English by culture and in love with all things Mexican.” In other words, a man who’s completely up himself. This is what he says:

There are many contrasting approaches to the arrangement of funerals, from the religious to the secular. But after five deaths and four funerals over the last two years, it seems to me that the humanist way of death is the most salutary.

Wonder what happened to the fifth funeral.

This is because it accepts one simple truth. Human life is constructed like a story. It has a beginning, high points, low points and then ends – definitively.

The humanist way of death recognises the fact that you will die and that when you do, that will be the story of you. From the viewpoint of our human, third person narrative, isn't the idea of heaven a little irritating? A life, like a good book, should never end in: " ... to be continued." Life only really makes sense as biography.

In contrast, religious funerals, where a stranger usually officiates and witters on about heaven, often fail to commemorate a life well lived properly. Religious funerals can be a whimpering anti-climax.

You can see where this is going. It’s just lazy, beastly dawkinism. But an existential event as a narrative event? I hadn’t thought of that. Now that’s really stupid. He goes on (can you take it?):

When Uncle Heini died this month at the age of 99 there was a lot to celebrate about his life. He survived two world wars honourably. Heini was flamboyant and kind. In his 80s he was still travelling from Machu Picchu to China. He even went climbing in the Himalayas at the age of 85. Heini was a well-known actor and a famous clown in the Munich theatre.

But his funeral was completely out of keeping with this, and I blame religion and its obsession with the afterlife for that. It put a damper on an occasion that should have been far more representative of who he really was. The crematorium orchestra played Albinoni and Bach, an actress read out a poem, the theatre administrator gave a thoughtful speech, and then a Lutheran pastor stood up with a wan smile and gave her homily. It was full of religious platitudes. In half an hour Heini's divine reispass was stamped, his celestial ticket clipped. And that was it; curtains.

Phil, you pillock, if you don’t want a Lutheran pastor or any other kind of pastor to talk resurrection at your funeral, DON’T BLOODY INVITE ONE. (Love the crem orchestra, though. In your dreams.)

A little bit of believe and let believe would go a long way from our atheist brothers and sisters. The Zero Militant is becoming tiresome.

Not for the first time (this is unrelated) I wonder why it is that atheists bring their dead people to a funeral. Come on, chaps, think it through: it’s nobbut carcass!


Read Phil's drivel here.

Labels:

5 Comments:

Anonymous Jonathan Taylor said...

Charles, dear Charles, let's get a few things straight.

To begin with, you're not entitled to encroach on another's crem slot, because they've paid for the full 30 (ie: 20) minutes, whether they use it or not. I've had that simple truth pointed out to me in no uncertain terms, several times. I was once obliged to cut short a 20 minute ceremony to barely more than 10, when the hearse had to detour 20 miles round a fatal road accident and arrived 15 minutes late. (OK, do the maths, that's real human compassion talking.) The following ceremony was committal only, but I was pointedly told that if we went more than a few minutes over our paid-for time, we'd be asked to leave, mid-funeral. Whatever can you be thinking, Charles? That a human life is more relevant than a financial contract?

And of course a human life is a story. If you don't go on existing when you die, you never existed in the first place. Life is probably a meaningless illusion, get over it. Don't believe, and don't tolerate belief in others. Didn't you know, the humanists worked out that 90 percent of us are humanists? That means you.

And whatever makes you think atheists bring their dead people to a funeral? Have you ever met an actual atheist? I worked with the humanist association for eight years, and I've never known such a self-consciously religious lot of people in my life. Why else would every one of their conversations end up so hotly disputing religion?

So: I trust that puts you right about a few things, and I hope I've cheered you up after such a god-awful, irony-free day.

With much love,

Jonathan x

3 November 2009 at 19:11  
Blogger Charles Cowling said...

Thank you for your rigorous good sense, Jonathan. You have quite restored my equilibrium. Yes, yes, silly me. Tsk tsk.

Do look out for the Crematorium Orchestra playing on Strictly Come Dancing this weekend. Or is it X Factor? (Is it Strictly Cwm Dancing in Wales?)

An extraordinary thing, to take a leap of faith, land on Nothing, then rabidly evangelise.

Hey ho!

3 November 2009 at 20:42  
Anonymous kathryn Edwards said...

One funeral involved two people, perhaps?
Or there was a funeral he didn't attend?

I thought Uncle Heini's funeral sounded rather marv (esp given crem orchestra!), but am wholly with you on the vicar paradox.

K

4 November 2009 at 00:08  
Blogger Rupert Callender said...

A good chapel attendant can smooth over all of the bureaucratic facelessness that crems feels stands between them and the collapse of order. It is understandable, this John Cleese like obsession with time, very little margin for error, but a calm presence and a little bit of reassurance goes a long way. It's one of the few times I don't mind being winked at. By a man.

4 November 2009 at 08:12  
Blogger X. Piry said...

I'm with you Charles, perhaps more than I'd be expected to be, as I am a card carrying humanist.

Firstly,I'm sorry that you didn't have the joy of some crematorium staff with a bit of common sense and some humour. We all fully understand the difficulty when you've got a waiting room full of mourners for the next ceremony, but as it was committal only, then the folks you've had to deal with do seem to have been a bit on the pedantic side. And you're right - twenty minutes is ridiculous (one of my local crematoria works to this time slot and it's a pain in the behind).

I also agree with you that the wrong funeral was arranged for the writer's uncle. If someone wants a celebration of the life lived without any reference to an "afterwards" (apart from the obligatory "living on in people's memories") then give me or one of my colleagues a shout - it's what we're here for.

However, if you want thoughts of a hereafter, the comfort of believing that your loved one is still watching over you or has gone to a better place, then find a kind and sympathetic celebrant, officiant or minister who will provide - it's what they are there for, too.

Jonathan - I know we've never met, but I am an actual atheist, however, I don't spend a lot of time arguing about religion.

I know what you mean about the fervour of the godless - it's sometimes like we've all just discovered something, and need to tell everyone that we meet.

Personally, however, I hate it when people try to preach religion at me, and so I never try to preach atheism at them. I'd rather discuss the things we have in common than the things that we haven't. After all, I know what I think, but I don't know that I'm right.

I'm not the only humanist like this, but we tend to be the quieter ones.

Peace out.

X.Piry

4 November 2009 at 13:52  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home