Everything is only for a day
Immortality and eternity have meaning as concepts but they don’t translate into reality, not here on transient Earth. If you don’t believe that, go and visit a mature cemetery – or ask Ozymandias, poor, baffled chap. Time teaches us this lesson every fleeting minute, but we set our faces against it—heroically or idiotically, it’s sometimes difficult to tell the difference. In the words of Marcus Aurelius:
Everything is only for a day, both that which remembers and that which is remembered.
Yesterday, I went to look around Brookwood cemetery in the elite company of two pioneers: Ken West, who sparked the natural burial movement here and, subsequently, worldwide; and Cynthia Beal, a natural burialist from the US. Ken is gentle and principled. He’s all for stripped-down simplicity. Cynthia is questing, questioning. She’s an environmentalist who makes things happen. Both are highly intelligent, so there were times when I fell off the back of their conversation bigtime. But if you look at a cemetery through the eyes of people with their combined knowledge of ecology, soil science, the law, lobbying and actually running cemeteries, you pick up a lot, even me. It was a privilege, let me tell you.
It’s a dreadful place of untended graves and collapsing monuments. It is the antithesis of all that it aspires to be, utterly incoherent. Especially consonant was the spectacle of an obelisk perhaps twenty-five feet high which, weary of pointing to Eternity, had just flung itself down.
Ken and Cynthia debated memorialisation. People want, need, to mark the spot. They must have somewhere to go and something to do. Problem is, most people stop doing that after around ten years, that’s when the rack and ruin set in. Cynthia is all for enabling people to mark the spot in ways which are not ecologically hostile. Ken is for anonymity and subsumation (a new word. I like it.)
It’s a complex matter, this business of memorialisation. Very complex. People tend graves to show they care. “Vanity!” said Ken. “Can they not show they care by allowing nature to receive them back, by permitting them to create habitats?”
My feelings exactly. But we don’t feel for all.
For all that, Brookwood is an object lesson in the vanity of human wishes. Its 500 acres are an ecological and memorial near-waste of space. Dire to think that it’s got around 250 years to go before it’ll be full.
On the journey back I overtook a catering caravan travelling to Glorious Goodwood. I passed signs to Royal Ascot. I reflected that I had spent the day at Buggered Brookwood.
Labels: memorialisation
2 Comments:
We went to Brookwood last week. It had one extra ingredient - myxomatosis. Seeing the place scattered with dead and dying rabbits gave it a real "Stephen King" vibe, as did the rabbit holes in some of the graves. Such a contrast with the order, elegance and peace of the Military Cemetery that we'd come to visit.
Jan
This article, and the one on Sarah Walton's urn/birdbaths, as well as the virtual commemorative sites discussed on this blog, gets me thinking about memorialization.
It's never appealed to me much, but it's clearly important to some people. The information that most headstones become neglected after ten years doesn't surprise me, though; I'd be worried if they didn't. A memorial to mark the physical place of the dead person in our life seems to me to be a temporary reference point, while finding out where they actually belong and taking them there.
The best place for our dead is somewhere they can stay, and it takes time to find somewhere like that in our secular world, with no signposts to an assembly point in the sky to await the second coming any more. We have to work it out for ourselves now, thank god, and it takes time. Meanwhile, you need a grid reference that you can still navigate to - hence the crumbling stones, the vanishing dodgy in memorium sites, and stolen bird baths. But don't try and preserve them; you can't take it with you when you go.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home